W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: "meaningless terms" verbage for Primer

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:06:52 -0500
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20021211140652.GD372@tux.w3.org>

The problem you see with isDefinedBy etc., won't be any different when
it comes to application vocabularies. xyz:Document, abc:Person, def:Event, etc.

Yet we're still encouraging people to go create schemas for such 
things and use them. Do you believe their classes and properties
to be 'meaningless'?
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 2002 09:06:55 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:51 EDT