W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: RDF schemas/analysis of XML Schema datatype relations (Re: Minutes RDF Core WG Telcon 2002-12-06)

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:11:24 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b1cba1a7eb6d169@[]>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>[Patrick Stickler, Nokia/Finland, (+358 40) 801 9690, 
>>  ...Discussion of datatypes schema, where to put it.
>>  >Suggestion that the schema be moved to a separate document and worked
>>  >at a different rate outside this WD.
>>  >
>>  >[scribe note: I think above might be an action to PatH or an
>>  >editorial change].
>>  I think that if it is an action item then it should be on some subset
>>  of Patrick, Jeremy and me. A new document presumably needs an editor,
>>  right? I could carry this if it is seen as a chore, but since the
>>  material is largely Jeremy/Patrick's, it would be more appropriate if
>>  it had their names on it.
>I think that Jeremy should get primary credit based on his material in
>would serve as an excellent foundation for such a document, adding
>in the RDF Schemas (reflecting different levels of contention/ambiguity)
>as appendices to that work, or referenced from that.
>And that would serve as good input to the XML Schema WG, perhaps with
>the goal of evolving it into a joint Note with a single RDF schema
>reflecting the concensus of the two WGs.

Agreed. Now, who is going to actually write up this thing? Who's the editor??

I ask because we are now in the same kind of position with regard to 
this that we were with Lbase: we need to be able to refer to it, but 
in order to do that it has to exist.

Maybe Brian should intervene and order one of us to do it.


IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 12:11:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:03 UTC