On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 23:06, pat hayes wrote: > > After reading through the Primer, particularly section 4, I propose > that almost all of section 3 of the semantics document be simply > removed. I don't know what's in section 3 of the semantics document. I'd appreciate pointers whenever documents are mentioned. > It's all in the primer section 4. > > Semantics section 3 should just list the RDF vocabulary that isn't > being given a formal meaning, say explicitly that it isn't, and refer > to the Primer for the informal meaning. If anyone feels that there > are any subtleties in section 3 that aren't in the primer text as it > stands, then lets put them into it. I don't think there are many, if > any, in fact. > > Anyone object? Frank?? > > Pat > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell > phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes > s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 09:04:25 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:50 EDT