[Resend: some addresses were messed up on the previuous version - #g] At 03:12 PM 12/15/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote: >@@I would like us to have this stated explicitly somewhere, and the >concepts doc is the obvious place. Hint, hint?? This is actually quite >timely, as there is mounting political pressure (mostly from the RuleML >folk) to insert highly nonmonotonic extensions into the webont mix, and >I'd like us to lock down the point that anything non-mon is not an RDF >semantic extension. I'm sympathetic, but we're locked down for last-call-candidate review, and this doesn't seem critical. I guess we could this as a comment to consider along with other WG LCC comments? #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 08:58:56 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:55 EDT