W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:13:15 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20021217102923.03895860@127.0.0.1>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 11:03 AM 12/16/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>At 03:12 PM 12/15/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>>@@I would like us to have this stated explicitly somewhere, and the 
>>>concepts doc is the obvious place. Hint, hint?? This is actually quite 
>>>timely, as there is mounting political pressure (mostly from the RuleML 
>>>folk) to insert highly nonmonotonic extensions into the webont mix, and 
>>>I'd like us to lock down the point that anything non-mon is not an RDF 
>>>semantic extension.
>>
>>I'm sympathetic, but we're locked down for last-call-candidate review, 
>>and this doesn't seem critical.
>
>I think it is cirtical that we as a group say this clearly *somewhere*.
>
>>I guess we could this as a comment to consider along with other WG LCC 
>>comments?
>
>Sure.

OK, I've started a last-call-candidate issues list [1]; this one is [2].

#g
--

[1] http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDFConceptIssues-group-lcc.html

[2] 
http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDF-Concepts/101-MonotonicLogic.html


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2002 06:25:38 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:55 EDT