W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Semantics doc now in shadow TR space

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:13:15 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 11:03 AM 12/16/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>At 03:12 PM 12/15/02 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>>>@@I would like us to have this stated explicitly somewhere, and the 
>>>concepts doc is the obvious place. Hint, hint?? This is actually quite 
>>>timely, as there is mounting political pressure (mostly from the RuleML 
>>>folk) to insert highly nonmonotonic extensions into the webont mix, and 
>>>I'd like us to lock down the point that anything non-mon is not an RDF 
>>>semantic extension.
>>I'm sympathetic, but we're locked down for last-call-candidate review, 
>>and this doesn't seem critical.
>I think it is cirtical that we as a group say this clearly *somewhere*.
>>I guess we could this as a comment to consider along with other WG LCC 

OK, I've started a last-call-candidate issues list [1]; this one is [2].


[1] http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDFConceptIssues-group-lcc.html


Graham Klyne
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 2002 06:25:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:03 UTC