W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-12-06

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:05:52 GMT
Message-ID: <423566.1039108049486.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-7>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Dec 06 2002 in America/New York duration 60+30 minutes

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Dec 06 2002 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: Scribes
Jeremy this week?
Volunteer to scribe next


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 13th Dec 2002
Thanks Giving?



5: Minutes of 2002-11-2 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0611.html


6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 2002-02-25#21 EricM
Ensure M&S has an erratum to say the M&S will be superceded by new documents

see:
  http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/errata

ACTION: 2002-04-26#5 Eric
get IPR statements link in place by April 30

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ipr-statements

ACTION: 2002-05-03#1 bwm
review charter over rdfms-charmod-uri resolution

ACTION: 2002-11-08#5 jjc
Jeremy Carroll: write up boilerplate to define URIRef with the special RDF meaning

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0558.html



7: Primer
2002-04-19#16  danbri  review effect of containerMembershipProperty superproperty on primer
2002-05-03#4  em  liase with danbri to ensure primer and schema stay in sync over the isDefinedBy issue

Latest ed's version I have is:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/09/rdfprimer/rdf-primer-20021124.html 

Status.  Issues.
             


8: Concepts Doc
2002-11-22#5  jjc  check that RDF Concepts does not allow a synonym for
                   rdf:XMLLiteral
Status.

The latest ed's WD pointer I have is:

  http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/RDF-concepts/20021121/Overview.html

Issue:  The 'clown' example - using third party vocabularies
         http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0023.html
This looks to be pretty well worked out.

        Definition of blank node
         http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0650.html
Is this resolved?  Ed's: please try to come to telecon with issue resolved.

         


9: Semantics Doc
2002-11-22#3  patH  Tie MT datatype to the sec that points out language
                    isn't important to DT entailment (except for
                    rdf:XMLLiteral)
2002-11-22#6  danc  review RDF Semantics, with a particular view to
                    "define a language, not a software spec"
Status.

Latest ed's WD url:
  http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes/RDF_Semantics_finalCall.html
a url I find encouragingly named.

Issues:
  Whether to include the xsd datatypes ontology.

             


10: Syntax Document
Status

Issues

  Canonicalization wording
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0649.html



11: Schema
2002-06-17#1  danbri  Update RDFS spec to reflect resolution of 
                      rdfms-seq-representation
2002-06-17#5  danbri  Update the schema spec to reflect the resolution of 
                      rdfs-isDefinedBy.
2002-06-17#7  danbri  Update the schema spec to account for editorial issues 
                      listed under rdfs-editorial.
2002-06-18#1  danbri  republish the current rdf schema to the current rdf 
                      schema uri
2002-07-12#6  danbri  try to move sec 5 to schema doc
2002-09-13#3  Danbri  update schema to cover 2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 5 to reflect
                      datatype concensus
2002-11-01#14  danbri Contact jjc/gk to ask them to review schema draft 

Status.
This doc isn't ready.  I've had the lock and not been able to get to it.
             


12: Testcases
2001-10-26-#1 bwm  make a test case to illustrate set/bag decision
2002-02-25#9  JanG  Ensure test cases for rdf:foo added to test cases WD
2002-04-05#5  Jeremy  write test cases for rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
2002-04-19#14 danc  do entailement test case for container with rdfs:contains
2002-04-19#18 jan  produce test case for rdfs-subClassOf-a-Property
2002-06-07#3  JanG  Fold in the consensus test cases and bring back the rest to the group
2002-06-07#4  JanG  Update the test case problems reported by JeremyC and DaveB
2002-05-31#3  JanG  Update test case document with tests for parseType collection
2002-09-13#6  Jan  create testcase to reflect datatype concensus
2002-09-20#1  jjc  Produce test case domain and range.
2002-10-11#1  janG  add test cases from msg Oct/0098
2002-11-01#11 DanC  Create test cases for non datatyped simple literals

Status.  Issues.
             

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0447.html


13: LBase Document
2002-11-01#16  danbri  team contact for publishinging LBase note

Status?


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Oct/0046.html


14: The last deliverable

We still have to decide what to do about the RDFCore deliverable:

       * provide an account of the relationship between RDF and the XML 
family of technologies (particularly Schemas and Infoset/Query)

We need to figure out if/how we meet this deliverable.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0473.html


15: Schedule


See:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/#microschedule


16: Publication Process

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Nov/0518.html



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 12:06:01 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:49 EDT