Re: Bug in MT?

>The MT states:
>
>    rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Literal .
>
>This doesn't seem correct to me.

Indeed, that is an old bug that should have been corrected, thanks 
for noticing. In fact I thought it had been corrected, so maybe it 
sneaked back in in a bad edit somewhere. I will check more carefully.

>
>Is the datatype class xsd:integer an instance of rdfs:Literal?
>I don't think so.
>
>Note that xsd:integer is not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Datatype, but
>is rdf:type rdfs:Datatype, so if the above assertion is intending
>to say that "10"^^xsd:integer is rdf:type rdfs:Literal then
>that's not right.
>
>Rather, what we need is a closure rule such as:
>
>IF
>    ddd rdf:type rdfs:Datatype .
>THEN
>    ddd rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Literal .
>
>Eh?

Right, indeed. I will fix this. Sorry.

Pat


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam