Re: concepts renumbered

This looks correct to me.
Jeremy

Dave Beckett wrote:

>>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
>>>>
>>See:
>>
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Dec/att-0029/00-rc
>>
>>Note - I have not yet agreed the following change with Graham.
>>new section 3.7, old section 2.5
>>3.7 RDF Core URI Vocabulary and Namespaces (Normative)
>>
>>(In the agreed change it was unclear where it went).
>>
>>Note2 - indentation in ToC is incorrect.
>>
> 
> [ I note TOC 4 has a 2.4.2 under it ]
> 
> So in summary the renumbering was
>   1.2 deleted
>   2.3 => 3
>     2.3.5 deleted, 2.3.6=>3.5, 2.3.7=>3.6
>   2.4 => 4 [reordered subsections]
>   2.5 now 3.7
>   3 onwards => 5 onwards
> 
> can you confirm, check this; maybe add in a changes note/email.
> 
> So all the structuring and renumbering is done now? 
> 
> Can I update my references now?
> 
> Dave
> 
>