W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > December 2002

Re: What are literals?

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:01:19 -0600
Message-Id: <p05111b4eba1c143c96cc@[10.0.100.86]>
To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>Can someone remind me what we decided about whether literals were 
>resources or not?

Actually it kind of follows from the MT that simple literals must be 
resources, since
1. they denote themselves, and
2. anything that is denoted must be a resource.

Typed literals are another kettle of fish, of course.

>Specifically, I'm trying to revise a sentence in the Primer that says:
>
>"All classes are implicitly subclasses of class rdfs:Resource (since 
>the instances belonging to all classes are resources)"
>
>against which there is a question concerning rdfs:Literal.

There shouldnt be. Anything that can be in a class must be a resource.

Pat

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 17:01:33 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:54:50 EDT