- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 13 Dec 2002 17:54:38 -0600
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 15:34, Brian McBride wrote: > > Actually, I think you should use the dated version. That's the advice given in the manual of style... "If there is an institutionalized identifier (URI) for a document, cite the most specific identifier. For example, link to http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224 rather than to http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/. " -- http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#References You're encouraged to note the latest version too; see the example citation of HTML4 for details. Hmm... I dunno if I like the "This version of the HTML 4.01 Recommendation is ..." bit. Salt to taste. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 13 December 2002 18:55:51 UTC