Re: What are literals?

At 10:11 12/12/2002 -0600, pat hayes wrote:

[...]


>Yes, this text has my mind reeling. My understanding of the reification 
>vocabulary was that the rdf:subject and rdf:object of a reified triple 
>were the things that the subject and object of the original triple 
>denoted. In which case the rdf:object is always a literal VALUE rather 
>than the literal itself, so yes, indeed, it can be said to be in 
>rdfs:Resource. So the range is rdfs:Resource, and this should be altered.

The vocab doc needs work.  It will get it.  Stick to what we have decided 
and expect it to come into line.

Brian

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 11:52:08 UTC