www-rdf-comments@w3.org from April to June 2003 by date

Monday, 30 June 2003

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents Jeremy Carroll
• tex-01 case of language tag [was RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: danc-02 goofy literals [was 2 formalities in RDF concepts] Dan Connolly
• Re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' Jeremy Carroll
• Re: danc-02 goofy literals [was 2 formalities in RDF concepts] Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 26 June 2003

• Re: Application veillard@redhat.com
• Re: Fwd: [webont-01] rdfcore issue 'rename schema' Dan Brickley
• Fwd: [webont-01] rdfcore issue 'rename schema' Jim Hendler

Monday, 23 June 2003

• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 20 June 2003

• [closed] pfps-03 translation to lbase Brian McBride
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Dan Brickley
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Karsten Tolle

Thursday, 19 June 2003

• Re: dealing with strings in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: dealing with strings in RDF Brian McBride
• Re: status of rdfs:Class Graham Klyne
• Re: dealing with strings in RDF Graham Klyne
• Re: status of rdfs:Class Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 18 June 2003

• Re: status of rdfs:Class Jos De_Roo
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• possible peculiarity with empty datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• status of rdfs:Class Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] Re: pfps-25 schema semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• dealing with strings in RDF Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [closed] query on Jeremy Carroll
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Dan Brickley
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Dan Brickley
• [vass-02] rdfcore issue 'property instances' was: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call Dan Brickley
• [closed] Re: pfps-25 schema semantics Dan Brickley
• [closed] Re: Issue pfps-24 What is RDF Schema? Dan Brickley
• [vass-01] rdfcore issue 'flat layering' Dan Brickley
• [closed] Re: [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation' Dan Brickley
• Re: [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation' Yuzhong Qu
• [webont-01] rdfcore issue 'rename schema' Dan Brickley
• [qu-04] rdfcore issue, 'rdf/xml representation' Dan Brickley

Tuesday, 17 June 2003

• Re: Minor Comments on "RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)" Dave Beckett

Monday, 16 June 2003

• Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf Dave Beckett
• Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf Dave Beckett
• Re: xml:base irrelevant to same document reference Graham Klyne
• Re: xml:base irrelevant to same document reference James Clark
• Re: xml:base irrelevant to same document reference Bill Kearney
• Re: xml:base irrelevant to same document reference James Clark

Sunday, 15 June 2003

• Re: xml:base irrelevant to same document reference Graham Klyne
• xml:base irrelevant to same document reference James Clark

Friday, 13 June 2003

• Re: problem introduced by recent change to RDF MT Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 12 June 2003

• Re: Error with RDFS draft pat hayes
• Error with RDFS draft Jimmy Cerra
• Re: problem introduced by recent change to RDF MT pat hayes

Wednesday, 11 June 2003

• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problem introduced by recent change to RDF MT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problem introduced by recent change to RDF MT pat hayes
• problem introduced by recent change to RDF MT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Dave Beckett

Monday, 9 June 2003

• Re: problem with closures in RDF Semantics document (version of 6 June 2003) Brian McBride

Wednesday, 11 June 2003

• Re: lean graphs in the semantics pat hayes

Tuesday, 10 June 2003

• lean graphs in the semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: incompleteness in RDFS closure rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: incompleteness in RDFS closure rules Jos De_Roo
• Re: incompleteness in RDFS closure rules pat hayes
• Re: incompleteness of rdf-closure pat hayes
• Minor Comments on "RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised)" Sean B. Palmer
• Re: incompleteness in RDFS closure rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: incompleteness of rdf-closure Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problem with N-Triples Dave Beckett
• RE: problem with N-Triples Danny Ayers
• Re: incompleteness in RDFS closure rules Jos De_Roo

Monday, 9 June 2003

• Re: incompleteness in RDFS closure rules pat hayes
• Re: incompleteness of rdf-closure pat hayes
• Re: problem with closures in RDF Semantics document (version of 6 June 2003) pat hayes

Saturday, 7 June 2003

• incompleteness in RDFS closure rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• problem with closures in RDF Semantics document (version of 6 June 2003) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• incompleteness of rdf-closure Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 6 June 2003

• keeping RDFS closure finite Dan Connolly
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Dave Beckett
• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Dave Beckett

Thursday, 5 June 2003

• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases pat hayes
• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Bill Kearney

Wednesday, 4 June 2003

• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Benja Fallenstein
• Re: strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Benja Fallenstein
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: problem with N-Triples Dave Beckett
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Dave Beckett
• Re: editorial buglet in n-triples Dave Beckett
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Dave Beckett
• Re: [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [closed] Re: buglet in syntax / test cases Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 3 June 2003

• www.ol247.net sales@ol247.net

Monday, 2 June 2003

• rules se1/2 pat hayes
• Re: more problems with closures pat hayes
• Re: more problems with closures Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: more problems with closures pat hayes

Sunday, 1 June 2003

• more problems with closures Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 30 May 2003

• problem with N-Triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [closed] Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases Jan Grant
• Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases Jan Grant
• Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases Jan Grant

Thursday, 29 May 2003

• invalid n-triples files in test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-03 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-01 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-08 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-08 pat hayes
• [closed] pfps-05 pat hayes

Tuesday, 27 May 2003

• What happened? wherehaveubeen@ilovechocolate.com
• editorial buglet in n-triples Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Brian McBride

Sunday, 25 May 2003

• Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 24 May 2003

• pfps-12 lists are not well formed Brian McBride
• notes from talking to bijan Dan Brickley

Friday, 23 May 2003

• A example use RDF cnahge content of hyperlink. Ping
• Entailment / Datalog Complete, Sound, Terminating / English Reasoning Adrian Walker

Thursday, 22 May 2003

• question about http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• query on Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• buglet in syntax / test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 20 May 2003

• Semantic Extensions Francesco Torelli

Monday, 19 May 2003

• [closed] RDF Core LC Issue timbl-03 Dave Beckett

Thursday, 15 May 2003

• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers Dave Beckett

Wednesday, 14 May 2003

• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers Brian McBride
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers Brian McBride
• Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 13 May 2003

• Turismo Rural - promoções fantásticas / promociones fantásticos Marcos&Marcos
• Re: RDF last call comment: escaping of URI references in N-triples Dave Beckett

Monday, 12 May 2003

• [closed] Re: small error in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) Dave Beckett

Saturday, 10 May 2003

• small error in RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 9 May 2003

• daml:item Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 8 May 2003

• Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics Ian Horrocks
• RDF last call comment: escaping of URI references in N-triples Martin Duerst
• Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics Brian McBride
• Re: [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics Ian Horrocks
• RE: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax Butler, Mark

Wednesday, 7 May 2003

• RE: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax Brian McBride
• RE: [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax Butler, Mark
• [closed] Re: file extension for RELAX NG Compact Schema Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 6 May 2003

• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct pat hayes
• RE: [closed] williams-01, What is a node in an RDF graph? Williams, Stuart
• RE: [closed] williams-01, What is a node in an RDF graph? Graham Klyne
• file extension for RELAX NG Compact Schema Eric Prud'hommeaux
• rdfs:Schema Class Brian McBride
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct Karsten Tolle
• RE: [closed] williams-01, What is a node in an RDF graph? Williams, Stuart

Monday, 5 May 2003

• Re: responses due for editorial changes (was Re: [closed] issue #pfps-10 untyped literals) pat hayes
• Re: question about attributes on the main document element Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: question about attributes on the main document element Francesco Cannistrà
• Re: question about attributes on the main document element Dave Beckett
• question about attributes on the main document element Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals pat hayes

Sunday, 4 May 2003

• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct Karsten Tolle

Saturday, 3 May 2003

• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 2 May 2003

• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals pat hayes
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct pat hayes
• responses due for editorial changes (was Re: [closed] issue #pfps-10 untyped literals) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] macgregor-02, Propositional attitudes Frank Manola
• Re: [closed] macgregor-02, Propositional attitudes Bob MacGregor
• Re: [closed] macgregor-02, Propositional attitudes Frank Manola

Thursday, 1 May 2003

• Re: [closed] issue #pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals pat hayes
• Re: [closed] issue #pfps-10 untyped literals pat hayes
• Re: [closed] issue #pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags pat hayes
• Re: pfps-18,19,20,21 namespace v vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] issue #pfps-10 untyped literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] issue #pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 30 April 2003

• Re: [closed] timbl-02, reification semantics pat hayes
• [closed] timbl-02, reification semantics Graham Klyne
• [closed] williams-01, What is a node in an RDF graph? Graham Klyne
• Re: [closed] Issue qu-01 Domain of rdfs:member Yuzhong Qu

Tuesday, 29 April 2003

• Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals pat hayes
• [closed] issue #pfps-07 typed literals with lang tags pat hayes
• [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax Dave Beckett
• [closed] xmlsch-11 layering on xml Dave Beckett
• [closed] xmlsch-12 capricious syntax Dave Beckett
• [closed] xmlsch-10 canonical syntax Dave Beckett
• [closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics pat hayes
• [closed] Issue qu-01 Domain of rdfs:member pat hayes
• [closed] Issue #qu-02 rdfs:member functional? pat hayes

Monday, 28 April 2003

• Re: Issue #danc-04 add a triviallyTrue predicate Dan Connolly
• RE: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents Dave Peterson
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents Dave Peterson
• RE: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents Jeremy Carroll

Sunday, 27 April 2003

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents pat hayes

Saturday, 26 April 2003

• Re: XML Schema WG comments on RDF documents C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Friday, 25 April 2003

• Re: Issue #danc-04 add a triviallyTrue predicate Jos De_Roo
• Re: Issue #danc-04 add a triviallyTrue predicate pat hayes
• Re: What is RDF Schema? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Issue #danc-04 add a triviallyTrue predicate Dan Brickley
• Re: What is RDF Schema? Dan Brickley

Thursday, 24 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Wednesday, 23 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Tuesday, 22 April 2003

• Re: [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules pat hayes
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules pat hayes
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules pat hayes
• Re: Issue #horst-01 RDFS entailment lemma pat hayes
• [closed] Re: Undefined terms in RDFS namespace Dave Beckett
• Re: add a triviallyTrue predicate Brian McBride
• Issue #danc-04 add a triviallyTrue predicate Brian McBride
• Issue #horst-01 RDFS entailment lemma Brian McBride
• Re: [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-07: Typed literals with lang tags Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [closed] pfps-10 untyped literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 21 April 2003

• [closed] pfps-10 untyped literals pat hayes
• [closed] pfps-07: Typed literals with lang tags pat hayes
• [closed] pfps-05 RDFS Closure Rules pat hayes
• Issue of support of Bag/Alt in RDF pat hayes
• Re: Clarifications needed for the Collection construct pat hayes
• Re: Statings -- Much ado about nothing Bob MacGregor
• Re: Statings -- Much ado about nothing pat hayes
• Re: error in Semantics document pat hayes
• Re: questionable statement in RDF semantics pat hayes

Saturday, 19 April 2003

• add a triviallyTrue predicate Dan Connolly

Thursday, 17 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Wednesday, 16 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma herman.ter.horst@philips.com

Tuesday, 15 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma Seth Russell
• Re: Undefined terms in RDFS namespace Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma Graham Klyne

Monday, 14 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma pat hayes
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma pat hayes

Sunday, 13 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations pat hayes

Friday, 11 April 2003

• Re: Values without lexical forms (xmlsch-04 your 2.2) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Schema: typo in description of rdfs:domain of rdfs:comment? Dan Brickley
• Re: Undefined terms in RDFS namespace Dave Beckett
• [Closed] Re: concepts doc: 404s aren't meaningful? Graham Klyne

Thursday, 10 April 2003

• Re: RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations pat hayes
• Re: typed containers in RDFS: suggestions about the "long range" problem Francesco Cannistrà
• [closed] Re: the empty list Brian McBride
• Re: the empty list Jerome Euzenat
• Re: RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma pat hayes
• typed containers in RDFS: suggestions about the "long range" problem Francesco Cannistrà
• Re: the empty list Brian McBride
• RDF Semantics: presenting the definition of rdfs interpretations herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• the empty list Jerome Euzenat
• RDF Semantics: RDFS entailment lemma herman.ter.horst@philips.com
• RE: [Closed] JSR188-01, Global datatyping Butler, Mark
• Re: search feature Brian McBride

Wednesday, 9 April 2003

• search feature Fabian Weber
• RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" Graham Klyne
• re: status of rdf, rdfs, and owl ``namespace files'' Brian McBride
• Re: [closed] tex-02 higher level matching rule for language tags Brian McBride
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" Williams, Stuart
• Re: Last Call comments on "Concepts and Abstract Syntax" Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 8 April 2003

• Re: [closed] reagle-01 reagle-02 XMLLiterals and exc-c14n Joseph Reagle
• RE: [closeed] williams-02 s/URIref/IRI/g Williams, Stuart
• [closeed] williams-02 s/URIref/IRI/g Jeremy Carroll
• [closed] tex-02 higher level matching rule for language tags Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [closed] reagle-01 reagle-02 XMLLiterals and exc-c14n Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 7 April 2003

• Re: [closed] timbl-01 bagid needed Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [closed] reagle-01 reagle-02 XMLLiterals and exc-c14n Joseph Reagle
• [Closed] JSR188-01, Global datatyping Graham Klyne
• Re: [closed] timbl-01 bagid needed Dave Beckett
• [closed] timbl-01 bagid needed Dave Beckett
• [closed] chas-01 request to add aboutEachPrefix Dave Beckett

Friday, 4 April 2003

• [closed] reagle-01 reagle-02 XMLLiterals and exc-c14n Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF Concepts document Jan 23, lang comments Tex Texin
• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call Vassilis Christophides
• Re: domains and ranges in RDFS semantics pat hayes
• issue pfps-25 pat hayes

Thursday, 3 April 2003

• Re: FORTH COMMENTS ON RDF Schema: Last Call pat hayes
• Re: language correction pat hayes
• Your Mapping Solutions Gregory S. Harkins

Wednesday, 2 April 2003

• Re: [closed] Re: nodeID Roland Schwaenzl
• Re: nodeID Roland Schwaenzl
• testing whether I'm still subscribed Brian McBride
• Re: RDF in SVG [was Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call] Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF in SVG [was Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call] Frank Manola
• [closed] Re: nodeID Brian McBride
• Re: RDF in SVG [was Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call] Dave Beckett
• Re: nodeID Dave Beckett
• RDF in SVG [was Re: reminder: RDF Core specs in Last Call] Brian McBride
• nodeID Roland Schwaenzl

Tuesday, 1 April 2003

• Re: [closed] macgregor-02, Propositional attitudes Bob MacGregor
• [closed] macgregor-02, Propositional attitudes Graham Klyne
• Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08 Dave Beckett
• Re: [closed] RDF Core LC issue xmlsch-08 Dave Beckett

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2003 17:10:58 UTC