W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Comment on Last Call Working Draft of RDF Syntax document concerning blank node identifiers

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 14:52:10 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

At 09:39 14/05/2003 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>My view is that the current Syntax document is incorrect, and incorrect in
>an important manner.

That may be but please note that editorial doesn't mean unimportant, it 
means that we don't need a WG decision to resolve it.

>   I have spent quite a bit of effort to get this
>changed, starting last year, well before Last Call, but the issue is not
>yet resolved to my satisfaction.
>The last communication I received was on 30 January 2003.  I had been
>waiting for the rest of the promised changes, but to my recollection I have
>not yet recieved any.

You are right - Dave did state intent - Dave - are these still on your todo 
list?  I note Dave also requested suggested wording from you.  Will you be 
able to suggest some?

Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:51:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:02 UTC