- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:05:53 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: tolle@dbis.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> [2003-06-18 16:04-0400] > This appears to be on the right track, but I have no way of viewing the > other changes, and no way of viewing the changes in context, so I don't see > how I can determine whether the changes are satisfactory. Fair point. The WD text has changed little since last call. I have some outstanding edits derrived from other LC comments, but nothing (to my knowledge) which should impact on this issue. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ is the LC text plus some minor edits: ---------------------------- revision 1.12 date: 2003/04/11 13:58:50; author: danbri; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 Fixed typo per: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0416.html:wq ---------------------------- revision 1.11 date: 2003/01/24 18:03:53; author: danbri; state: Exp; lines: +51 -43 fixed date errors. ---------------------------- I plan to make some more modest updates in-place at that URL (with 'status' updated accordingly to avoid confusion), until we agree new URIs for the next batch of TR-published RDFCore docs. My editorial todo list is based on the issue closures linked from our LC issue list, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#schema I hope this clarifies the state of the doc for you. If I commit changes to the spec I'll make these explicit so you can see what's what. cheers, Dan
Received on Friday, 20 June 2003 08:07:02 UTC