W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

[closed] Issue horrocks-01 rdfs:comment semantics

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:30:10 -0500
Message-Id: <p05210615bad466f022d6@[]>
To: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org




you made a last call comment on the RDFCore last call WD's, recorded as


The RDFCore WG has considered your comment and resolved not to accept it:


This comment gave rise to considerable discussion. While the WG is
sympathetic to the need for semantically empty comments, to add a
special syntax for them was considered too much of a change to RDF at
this stage and possibly outside the WG charter.  Also, the WG noted
that applications can store such comments in an external RDF surface
syntax (eg in XML). Concerning the proposal to render rdf:comment
entailments inoperative (vacuously true) by semantic fiat, the WG
notes that other users desire rdf:comment entailments to hold, so
modifying the semantics to make all such entailments trivial would be
controversial.  Moreover, we note that OWL can impose such a condition
within OWL-RDF as part of a semantic extension.

Please respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
indicating whether this decision is acceptable.

Please note also, that there is another, related and as yet
unresolved comment:


which requests adding a trivially true predicate.  Would you like to be
considered a co-submitter of this comment and informed about its resolution?

Pat Hayes

IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola               			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501            				(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ai.uwf.edu	          http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
s.pam@ai.uwf.edu   for spam
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:30:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:02 UTC