Re: [closed] macgregor-02, Propositional attitudes

Hi Graham,

I was kind of waiting (but not holding my breath) for the other shoe to
drop.  Now it has :)

This decision is acceptable to me.

At 05:01 PM 4/1/2003 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>Bob,
>
>I'm sorry to make a meal of this, but I overlooked that the removal of 
>"social meaning" from RDF Concepts also seems to address your point about 
>propositional attitudes, recorded as:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02
>
>The RDFCore WG has resolved, per:
>
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0124.html
>
>to accept this comment, as follows:
>
>RDF does not provide means to express propositional attitudes.
>
>The specific text that gave rise to this comment is being removed.
>
>Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
>whether this decision is acceptable.
>
>#g
>
>
>-------------------
>Graham Klyne
><GK@NineByNine.org>
>PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E

=====================================
Robert MacGregor
Senior Project Leader
macgregor@isi.edu
Phone: 310/448-8423, Fax:  310/822-6592
Mobile: 310/251-8488

USC Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90292
=====================================