Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Subject: Re: pfps-12 lists are not well formed
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 08:05:53 -0400

> * Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> [2003-06-18 16:04-0400]
> > This appears to be on the right track, but I have no way of viewing the
> > other changes, and no way of viewing the changes in context, so I don't see
> > how I can determine whether the changes are satisfactory.
> 
> Fair point. The WD text has changed little since last call. I have some 
> outstanding edits derrived from other LC comments, but nothing (to my
> knowledge) which should impact on this issue.
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/ is the 
> LC text plus some minor edits:
> 
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.12
> date: 2003/04/11 13:58:50;  author: danbri;  state: Exp;  lines: +1 -1
> Fixed typo per:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0416.html:wq
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.11
> date: 2003/01/24 18:03:53;  author: danbri;  state: Exp;  lines: +51 -43
> fixed date errors.
> ----------------------------
> 
> I plan to make some more modest updates in-place at that URL (with 
> 'status' updated accordingly to avoid confusion), until we agree new URIs for 
> the next batch of TR-published RDFCore docs.
> 
> My editorial todo list is based on the issue closures linked from 
> our LC issue list, see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#schema
> 
> I hope this clarifies the state of the doc for you. If I commit changes 
> to the spec I'll make these explicit so you can see what's what.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan

Good.  I await the changes to the appropriate sections of the document for
final approval then.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
Lucent Technologies

Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 13:31:00 UTC