- From: Roland Schwaenzl <Roland.Schwaenzl@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:36:41 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: roland@mathematik.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> From Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk Wed Apr 2 19:07 MET 2003 > To: Roland Schwaenzl <roland@mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de> > cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: nodeID > Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:04:56 +0100 > From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> > > >>>Roland Schwaenzl said: > > maybe i'm missing something: Is there mentioning rdf:nodeID is not > > supposed to survive parsing at another place than in the syntax and > > model document? > > I'm sorry, I can't understand what you are asking here. rdf:nodeID > is an attribute used in the RDF/XML syntax, it doesn't appear in the > Semantics document or RDF model. The content of the nodeID attribute.... > > > > > I would like to see cases -if there are- described in the primer, which > > require (!) the use of rdf:ID, rdf:resource and other syntax constructs - > > Sorry again, I don't understand what you are asking about "requiring" > the use of "syntax constructs". For example a case in which use of the rdf:ID attribute cannot be substituted by any other RDF/XML syntax construction representing the same graph. rs > > Dave > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 13:36:44 UTC