- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 16:44:13 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Charles, You made a last call comment captured in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#chas-01 The RDF Core WG has resolved http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0128.html to reject this comment on the grounds that the original reasons for removal remain valid: * We had good feedback that it lived badly in RDF and as such was little implemented or used. * It broke layering by looking inside URIs rather than dealing with them as identifiers. * Felt more like a RDF/XML syntax thing than part of the RDF model and as such it mixed badly with triples. * Worked badly with rdf:bagID - the interactions were never well understood. * Experienced practitioners recommended against using it. Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this decision is acceptable. Dave
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 11:45:07 UTC