- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 07:04:48 -0400
- To: hendler@cs.umd.edu
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Jim, Thanks for your comments in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0335.html on RDFCore's RDFS document. This message is a response to one issue you raised there on behalf of WebOnt, namely the request that we change the name to omit the word 'schema'. After some discussion, both email, telecon and face to face amongst those of us who were at WWWW2003, the working group decided on June 6th[1] not to accept this change. The cost of purging the phrase 'rdf schema' from use in our specs, in other W3C specifications, and from wider use is high. The working group did give serious consideration to making this change, but could not justify the cost given the stage we are at the development and deployment of this technology. As a result, we continue to use 'rdf schema' as the name for RDF Core's vocabulary description language. Please reply to this message as to whether this response is satisfactory, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org. Again, thank you for your comments. Dan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0067.html
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 07:04:49 UTC