responses due for editorial changes (was Re: [closed] issue #pfps-10 untyped literals)

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Subject: Re: [closed] issue #pfps-10 untyped literals
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:52:31 -0500

[...]

> It is not practical, and I do not think it would be useful, to give a 
> detailed list of every textual change made as a result of this 
> comment.

[...]

Hmm.  Well, if the changes are to be treated as editorial changes, I think
that this is precisely what is owed.

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
Lucent Technologies

Received on Friday, 2 May 2003 15:19:25 UTC