- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 22:16:33 +0100
- To: "'Graham Klyne'" <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Graham, > -----Original Message----- > From: Graham Klyne [mailto:gk@ninebynine.org] > Sent: 6 May 2003 13:58 > To: Williams, Stuart > Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org > Subject: RE: [closed] williams-01, What is a node in an RDF graph? > > <snip/> > >The proposal at [1] does address my comment. > > > >I do have a question about the second paragraph of section 3.1: > > > > " A URI reference or literal used as a node identifies what that node > > represents. A URI reference used as a predicate identifies the > > relationship between the nodes it connects. A predicate URI reference may > > also be a node in the graph." > > > >Given the first sentence, does a predicate identify a relationship > >between the connected graph nodes (which is what the 2nd sentence > >says), or between the things that the connected nodes represent? > > Ouch! > > (I assume you mean 2nd para, section 3.2 in the proposed wording?) Yes.. 3.2 sorry. > So I think that should be something like: > [[ > A URI reference or literal used as a node identifies what > that node represents. A URI reference used as a predicate > identifies a relationship between things represented by the > nodes it connects. ]] I'll happily defer to whatever the WG decides, I just didn't feel confident that the prposed wording necessarily said what WG would want it to say. If it does, then that's fine. > #g > > >Thanks > > > >Stuart > >-- > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0199.html > >[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0207.html Best regards Stuart
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2003 17:17:06 UTC