- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:43:11 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
On Thu, 22 May 2003 11:05:06 -0400 "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > > It appears to me that > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-nested-bagIDs/test007.rdf > should be allowable. In particular the claim is that rdf:bagID and > rdf:resource are not both allowed on property elements. However, > production 7.2.21 appears to allow both rdf:bagID and rdf:resource in > empty property elements. rdf:bagID has, subsequent to the last public WD, been removed from the RDF/XML language. Consquently both that production in the syntax WD will be removed and that test case will be made into an error. Dave
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:44:40 UTC