- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 12:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/, Section 5.1 Within RDF/XML documents it is not permitted to use XML namespaces whose namespace URI is either: - the RDF Namespace URI Reference concatenated with additional characters or - the XML Namespace URI Reference concatenated with additional characters. So ... xmlns:xm = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namesp" ... rdf:about="ace#hi" ... is legal, as is ... xmlns:xmx = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" ... rdf:about="#hi" ... but ... xmlns:xmxx = "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace#h" ... rdf:about="i" ... is not. Also, ... xmlns:rd = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-n" ... rdf:about="s#hi" ... is legal, as is ... xmlns:rdf = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" ... rdf:about="hi" ... but ... xmlns:rdx = "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#h" ... rdf:about="i" ... is not. Weird. Is this desirable behaviour? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:24:37 UTC