- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:25:48 -0500
- To: "Qu Yuzhong" <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Qu, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0308.html you raised a last call comment on the RDFCore WD's which was recorded as: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#qu-02 The RDFCore WG has considered your comment and resolved not to accept it: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0124.html on the grounds that (a) the suggestion is not necessary, particularly as the condition can be stated explicitly in OWL; and (b) it might damage the behavior of existing code. In addition, I note that this suggestion would provide a back-door way of expressing general equality in RDFS, greatly complicating the proof rules. Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether this decision is acceptable. Pat Hayes -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 13:25:52 UTC