- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 08:53:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> Subject: Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:46:00 +0100 (BST) > On Fri, 30 May 2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> > > Subject: Re: invalid n-triples files in test cases > > Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:22:07 +0100 (BST) > > > > > On Thu, 29 May 2003, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The documents at > > > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test001.nt > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test002.nt > > > > > > > > do not appear to be valid N-Triples documents because they are missing the > > > > final end-of-line. > > > > > > Noted, thanks. > > > > How about a fix? > > My pleasure. I've just checked in fixed copies of all the NTriples files > in that directory that were missing EOLs. I'll run over the others now. Thanks. I wonder how these files managed to pass the other implementations. peter
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 08:54:03 UTC