- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:17:29 +0100
- To: Stuart Williams <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Stuart, With reference to: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#williams-01 The RDFcore working group have considered your comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0238.html suggesting that "Nodes in an RDF are ... labelled with a URI Reference ...". We recognize that the terminology used has been inconsistent, and have resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0207.html to revise the terminology consistently in a different way to that you suggest, viz. that URI References *are* nodes in an RDF graph, in line with the terminology articulated by Pat Hayes [1]. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0152.html (I also note that the description of abstract graph syntax in section 6 of Concepts is already consistent with this terminology.) Can you please respond to <www-rdf-comments@w3.org> indicating whether this response is satisfactory. Thank you. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2003 04:43:24 UTC