Re: problem with closures in RDF Semantics document (version of 6 June 2003)

On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 15:57, pat hayes wrote:
> >The wording for closures is not correct.
> >
> >For example, rdf-closures are defined in Section 4.1 using
> >
> >	Apply the rules se1 and se2 and .... to generate all RDF triples
> >	(i.e.[,] until none of the rules apply or the graph is unchanged.)
> >	[sic]
> >
> >However, if an RDF graph contains any triples always possible to apply rule
> >se1 in a way that changes the graph.
> Yes, this needs to be reworded slightly. It is only necessary to use 
> these rules to generate a single generalization of each generalizable 
> triple to produce a closure. I will add prose to this effect.

Does se1 need to fire at all if the object is a bnode?  Similarly se2.


Received on Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:56:18 UTC