W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: [closed] reagle-01 reagle-02 XMLLiterals and exc-c14n

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:06:19 -0400
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org, eric@w3.org, hendler@cs.umd.edu
Message-Id: <200304071406.19838.reagle@w3.org>

On Friday 04 April 2003 15:55, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Joe's original mail:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0335.html

That's actually:

> to accept this issue and address it as proposed in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Mar/0151.html
> 1: Only reference the exclusive canonicalization rec.

Sounds good.

> 2: The syntax document specifies that the lexical form corresponding to
> the syntax rdf:parsetype="Literal"> XML content </ is the exclusive
> canonicalization with comments of that XML content. (With empty inclusive
> namespace prefix list)

So just to be very clear, the XML literal is exc-c14n as if it were its own 
distinct fragment? So even if a namespace/prefix is declared above in the 
RDF, it will be repeated in the XML literal.

> 5. the following implementation note is added to concepts:
> any other equivalent form.  As an example:
> literals with datatype <tt>rdf:XMLLiteral</tt>s can be represented
> in a non-canonical
> format, and canonicalization performed during the comparison between two
> such literals

The second fragment after the "and" confuses me.

> Joe, also note that we have not yet given detailed consideration to your
> comment "Confusion about wrapping of XMLLiteral"
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0434.html
> Now that we have removed all freedom in the syntax document, is this
> sufficiently clear (i.e. that the wrapping happens as part of the
> datatype mapping).
> Or would you like us to consider that comment further?

I still find this section confusing. For example, "The XML document 
corresponding to a string str is formed as the XML document corresponding 
to the pair (str, "")." This is a restatment of the earlier statement, "The 
XML document corresponding to a pair ( str, lang ) is formed as follows:" 
which leads to confusion.
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 14:06:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:02 UTC