Re: [closed] pfps-10 untyped literals

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
• To: phayes@ai.uwf.edu
• Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20030421.230449.76219856.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Subject: [closed] pfps-10 untyped literals
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:35:38 -0500

> Per, re. your comment
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0085.html
> 
> the conditions have been modified to
> 
> ICEXT(I(rdfs:Literal)) = LV
> 
> Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating
> whether this decision is acceptable.
> 
> Pat

This change appears to have adequately addressed this comment.  

I note, however, that there are many changes to the RDF Semantics.  These
changes may have uncovered previously unnoticed issues and may themselves
have issues. 

In particular, I note that the added conditions on container membership
properties don't make sense, both taken literally and when obvious
corrections have been applied.

peter

Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 23:04:59 UTC