- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 19 Apr 2003 15:25:52 -0500
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Consider adding to RDFS a triviallyTrue predicate; specification: ?S rdfs:triviallyTrue ?O. is true for all ?S and ?O. Rationale: (1) jeremy's digital signature application needs to number bnodes (2) folks are asking for all uses of rdfs:comment to be vacuously true. This would provide that functionality. Options: call it noop or... hmm... rdfs:comment really is poorly named. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Saturday, 19 April 2003 16:25:45 UTC