- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 15:19:25 +0100
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'Jeremy Carroll'" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
At 09:28 09/04/2003 +0100, Williams, Stuart wrote: >I think that you are telling me that section 7 "Fragment Identifiers" is >deemed informative ... I think that is correct. By my reading and intent, this section says nothing about the meaning of RDF that is not already covered by the formal semantics. Rather, it explains and amplifies that that meaning is not in conflict with more conventional uses of fragment identifier in the web. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 13:05:39 UTC