- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:07:10 +0300
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org, skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Stuart, SubTopic: Informative/Normative I made a small mistake ... :( In: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0329.html [[ Stuart: > 9) Section 7 Fragment Identifiers. > > This section (and many others) is not explicitly labelled as normative or > informative (both deginations are used elsewhere). I assume this is an > informative section, but I think it would be helpful to be explicit in this > case rather than leave any doubt. Jeremy: I believe we intended it as informative. Accepted. ]] We have deleted the last occurrance of the word "informative" in a section heading with the resolution of the social meaning issue. The other occurrence of the word informative is in section 1 http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/#section-Introduction The sentence being: [[ Within this document, normative sections are explicitly labelled as such. Explicit notes are informative. ]] I hope that that sentence adequately addresses this concern, and no change is necessary. Please reply if this is OK. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2003 04:06:43 UTC