Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals

>From: pat hayes <>
>Subject: Re: pfps-08 last call comment on typed literals
>Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 18:32:19 -0500
>>  >Note that even this would not eliminate all the concerns I have with
>>  >rdf:XMLLiteral.
>>  Suppose (just suppose, mark you) that lang tags were eliminated
>>  altogether from the graph syntax, even from XML literals, and
>>  rdf:XMLLiteral were a built-in datatype with a lexical-to-value map
>>  which simply applies an XML canonicalization to the literal string.
>>  Might that overcome your concerns, if it were done in a suitable way?
>>  Pat
>This would be much better.
>However, the lexical-to-value map for rdf:XMLLiteral is rather bogus right
>now.  Why should there be the extra ``junk'' added, for example?  It seems
>to me that it would be better to have the denotation of
>	"<xxx></xxx>"^^rdf:XMLLiteral
>	"<xxx></xxx>"
>and not
>	"<rdf-wrapper ....><xxx></xxx></rdf-wrapper>"

Please take that one up with Jeremy. I defer to him on matters 
concerned with XML syntax.


IHMC					(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola              			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501           				(850)291 0667    cell	   for spam

Received on Monday, 5 May 2003 11:09:01 UTC