- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:12:00 -0500
- To: macgregor@ISI.EDU
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <p05111b0cbaca1c072506@[10.0.100.12]>
Bob, re. your comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0211.html and the ensuing discussion. The WG felt that deletion of the section, as requested, was not useful, and that the wording of the section was sufficiently careful to avoid a reader having a false impression of the intended meaning. A few sentences have been added to clarify the distinction between reification as described here and quotation, as follows: "Note that this way of understanding the reification vocabulary does not interpret reification as a form of quotation. Rather, the reification describes the relationship between a token of a triple and the resources that triple refers to. The reification can be read intuitively as saying "'this piece of RDF talks about these things" rather than "this piece of RDF has this form". ". Please reply to this email, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this decision is acceptable. Pat -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes s.pam@ai.uwf.edu for spam
Received on Monday, 21 April 2003 18:12:04 UTC