[TR] Substantive Change
[TR] Editorial wrt Maturity Levels
w3process-ISSUE-50 (Directors-Calls): If LC and CR are combined, Director's Calls can be excessive overhead [Processes that Suck e.g. too much time, resources, make work, etc.]
LC-TRprocess-20131024#last-call "complex documents" is too subjective
LC-TRprocess-20131024#last-call point #2 needs clarification
Are Director's Calls mandatory for LCCR?
[TR] Status Section Requirements
LCCR is a silly name
[minutes] 2013-10-28 Chapter 7 revisions Task Force teleconference
No meeting of the Process Document Task Force is planned for Nov 4 or Nov 11
Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 28 October
Revisions to Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document
- Re: Revisions to Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document
- Re: Revisions to Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document
New draft, minutes of the Chapter 7 Task Force
Pushed proposed Ch 7 "LC draft"
Draft Last Call letter for the revision of Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document
ISSUE-49: Links in chapter 7 ed don't work e.g. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ab/raw-file/default/tr.html#moztocid983157
New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
- Comments re 7.6.2 and LCCR [Was: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal]
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
- Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
- Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal
w3process-ISSUE-48 (status of provisionally approved Rec): Status of this document requirements for Provisionally vs formally approved W3C Recommendations [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-47 (in situ TR changes): What kind of changes can be "silently" made to a document in /TR [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October
- Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October
- Re: Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October
Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- RE: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
- Re: Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]
small comment on the AB draft process document
- Re: small comment on the AB draft process document
- Status and "Proposed Recommendation" Re: small comment on the AB draft process document
New Editor's draft, Chapter 7
w3process-ISSUE-46 (explain heartbeat-only): Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]
Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force
Errata and Edited Recommendation
Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section
w3process-ISSUE-44 (MinorUpdateNoNewReview): Process should be clear that minor edits at same level do not trigger new review period
New Editor's draft of Chapter 7
w3process-ISSUE-43 (edited rec: transition?): Does publishing an edited Recommendation require meeting all "state transition" requirements?
Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7
- Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7