W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:52:20 +0100
To: "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.w4d3xir4y3oazb@chaals.local>
This addresses the last of the pieces in your email.

On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:11:23 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

>  * 7.2.3. "Worthy ideas should be recorded even when not incorporated
>    into a mature document." Suggest instead:
>     "The Working Group SHOULD record substantive proposals even when
>     not incorporated into a mature document."
>    First idea is to identify the subject. Also, "worthy" sounds a bit
>    to judgmental to my ear. But I don't feel too strongly about it.

I got

"Working Groups should record substantive or interesting proposals raised  
by reviews but not incorporated into a current specification."


Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 17:52:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:51:16 UTC