- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:55:32 -0400
- To: "w3c-ac-forum@w3.org" <w3c-ac-forum@w3.org>, "chairs@w3.org" <chairs@w3.org>
- CC: "ab@w3.org" <ab@w3.org>, "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <52697B34.3090703@w3.org>
It has been pointed out that I neglected to give a deadline for comments, which will be 27 November. Jeff On 10/24/2013 3:07 PM, Jeff Jaffe wrote: > > Colleagues, > > The Advisory Board proposes revisions to Chapter 7 (Technical Report > Development Process) of the W3C Process to make it simpler to > understand, crisper to execute, yet still consistent with the patent > policy, by enabling process steps to happen in parallel. > > Almost two years ago, the Advisory Board began looking for ways to > make specification development more agile. Both in fora, such as TPAC > [1], and via e-mail and member surveys a number of potential topics > were identified [2] and prioritized [3]. > > In the November 2012 TPAC Meeting [4], the Advisory Board realized > that some of the major issues related to agility were in the > complexity of Last Call, Candidate Recommendation and Proposed > Recommendation. Because these are completely specified in Chapter 7 of > the current W3C Process, we have focused on a modified Chapter 7 which > is being sent to you as a "Last Call" Document [5] prior to Review by > the Advisory Committee and adoption. The remaining process issues > (those not directly related to Chapter 7) have been tabled until a > future revision of the W3C Process. Advisory Committee Review will be > done on a complete Process Document with the current Chapter 7 > replaced by the Chapter 7 that results from Last Call. The current > Chapter 7 is at [6]. > > *Motivation:* Web technology development has changed greatly over the > past 20 years, and these changes keep the W3C Process in step. Just > as "agile" software development stresses rapid iteration between > design and implementation, Web technologies are now implemented and > deployed in parallel with spec development. This allows us to combine > the Last Call and Candidate Recommendation steps since implementation > and testing are more frequently happening earlier than when the W3C > Process was formulated. The recent emphasis on early and continuous > testing, plus the reality that almost all WGs operate in public, means > that specs are widely reviewed in parallel with their polishing and > testing. Having fewer process steps while making the entrance and exit > criteria more clear and explicit should make the process simpler to > understand. Refinement and review activities happen in parallel which > should make standardization faster. We maintain alignment with the > Patent Policy to minimize disruption. In addition to combining LC and > CR, the definitions of "wide review" and "implementation experience" > are clarified and some non-normative "advice" has been removed to > provide crisper exposition. > > Comments and requests for clarification are welcome. This work is > done in public and the public-w3process@w3.org > <mailto:public-w3process@w3.org> mailing list is the best place to > send comments and questions. > > Jeff Jaffe, Chair, W3C Advisory Board > Charles McCathie-Nevile, Editor, W3C Process Document > Steve Zilles, Chair, W3C Process Document Task Force > > [1] There were a number of relevant break-out sessions at TPAC 2011: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2011/Agile_Standardization > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2011/Revisiting_how_W3C_creates_standards > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2011/Fixing_schedule_delays > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2011/W3C_Publications_Ecosystem > and at TPAC 2012: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2012/agile_W3C_Process_Agility > http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2012/session-tr > http://www.w3.org/2012/10/31-testing-minutes.html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Mar/att-0007/AB_List_of_Concerns-20120306.htm > [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-forum/2012AprJun/0024.html > [4] > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2012OctDec/0053.html, > Day 2, item 4. > [5] http://www.w3.org/2013/10/LC-TRprocess-20131024 > [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/process.html#Reports > <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/process.html> > >
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 19:55:40 UTC