w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/45

Raised by: Charles McCathie Nevile
On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)

This issue was raised by Chris Lilley in email [1].

The basic question is whether it is important to clarify that while a group should address all errata before proposing an edited recommendation, they may propose an edited recommendation while there are outstanding errata in order to provide an improvement in the current Recommendation rather than an unnecessary dealy while the strive for perfection.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/2013Oct/thread.html#msg21

Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 21:23:01 UTC