Re: Changes to classes of changes?

On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:47:53 +0200, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

> <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>>>>> I raised ISSUE-47 for this point. I think that markup changes  
>>>>>> should be allowed "silently" - i.e. no announcement required.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the Director's current policy:
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2003/01/republishing/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. I am proposing to bring the Process more in line with this.  
>>>> But I am still not entirely happy with the section - it is unclear  
>>>> *who* can request or approve a change…
>>>
>>> That document says:
>>>
>>> "Editors (or others) send a request to the Webmaster, cc'ing the  
>>> domain lead, webreq, and w3t-comm. The request must include:"
>>>
>>> I believe it is intentionally left open. I would not want to constrain  
>>> it unwittingly.
>>
>> Nor would I. But in the latest draft (just pushed to public), I  
>> "wittingly" set expectations of who might do this.
>>
>> Review and feedback appreciated.
>
> Hi Charles,
>
> It seems the definitions of classes of changes have changed. My  
> recollection of discussion in June was that we planned to import as-is  
> the change classes. You have changed
>
>  "Corrections that do not affect conformance"
>
> to:
>
>  "Corrections to references"

Yep.

> I may have missed the discussion that led up to that change. But as I  
> said my recollection was that we wanted to import change classes as is.

I did that. And following the discussion this evening in relation to this  
section, I have made a couple of changes, tracked in ISSUE-47...

> Sorry if I've missed discussion about this.

It's probably waiting in your inbox for when you finish your "as soon as  
the bits got updated" review :) I'll assume that and wait for further  
comments on this.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 01:53:27 UTC