- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 15:33:50 -0500
- To: "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Oct 3, 2013, at 3:52 PM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > This addresses the last of the pieces in your email. > > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 02:11:23 +0100, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > >> * 7.2.3. "Worthy ideas should be recorded even when not incorporated >> into a mature document." Suggest instead: >> >> "The Working Group SHOULD record substantive proposals even when >> not incorporated into a mature document." >> >> First idea is to identify the subject. Also, "worthy" sounds a bit >> to judgmental to my ear. But I don't feel too strongly about it. > > I got > > "Working Groups should record substantive or interesting proposals raised by reviews but not incorporated into a current specification." Sounds fine. Thanks. Ian > > cheers > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com > -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 20:33:53 UTC