Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal

On 10/17/2013 9:44 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> as always at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/tr.html
>
> changes were mostly related to Ivan Herman's comments and subsequent 
> discussion:
>  - tweaked and poked at Section 7.6.2 on modifying a recommendation
>  - added requirements for status to be unique, and explicitly identify 
> if a spec is published as a provisionally approved Recommendation 
> (technically, there is no requirement to republish in this case) or a 
> W3C Recommendation (Yes, these really need to be republished still :) ).
>  - Some editorial stuff
>
> Full changelog at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/
>
> Your comments on the changes, or the document as is, are as always 
> very welcome.
>
> There are now 7 issues pending review. Issues 2 and 37 are old and I 
> think only pending review because we forget them. 44-46 are from the 
> last draft (there has been no meeting of the Ch7TF since then). Issue 
> 47 is dealt with in this draft, but I am not sure if it is ready for 
> closing, and would really appreciate a close look. Issue 48 is also 
> dealt with in this draft, and while of course I appreciate feedback I 
> am happier that it has been handled reasonably.
>
> There is also the open issue 39 (transition) and accompanying 
> discussion on this list.
>
> Finally, Ivan Herman points out that the name Last Call Candidate 
> Recommendation is horrid. I agree, but think we need "Last Call" in 
> the title to help us clarify that it is the stage referred to in the 
> Patent Policy as "Last Call". Anyone have a good idea for this?

How about "Last Call"?

>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>

Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 14:12:49 UTC