- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 21:11:59 +0200
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
Hello Public-w3process, This comment relates to publishing an edited recommendation https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/tr.html#rec-publication I am concerned that the current text might be interpreted in a way that leads to significant delay in the publication of Edited Recommendations. Consider the following situation: a WG has dealt with 100 errata items, which all have tests and an implementation report that shows implementors are on board with the changes. They plan to publish an Edited Rec on Tuesday. On Monday a new errata item is opened. Lets assume it is non trivial and generates substantial discussion about whether it is actually an error and if so, the best way to fix it. Now consider the current wording from 7.4.5 Publication of a W3C Recommendation. > To publish an Edited Recommendation as a W3C Recommendation, a Working Group > must republish the document, identifying it as the basis of a Request for Recommendation. > must show that the document has received wide review > should document known implementation. > should address all errata. Its a SHOULD, but I can see groups interpreting that as 'the errata queue must be empty' so another three months goes by while they deal with that one erratum, make tests, get passes. Meanwhile another erratum shows up and so on. Perhaps the following text would help? Not sure but its a start, suggestions welcome. > should either address all errata, or be published with a non-empty > errata list for those items still under discussion or awaiting > testing and implementation. I would rather see the latest edited Recommendation roll in all the stable, tested errata and have a non-empty errata list, rather than the latest Edited Recommendation be years old and only make sense to those people who can carry around large diff documents in their head pertaining to all the stuff you need to "just know" about. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 19:12:00 UTC