- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 09:47:41 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Oct 3, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > On 10/3/13 9:23 AM, ext Ian Jacobs wrote: >> On Oct 3, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: >> >> it is by design that CGs do not set expectations for airtight record-keeping, just good enough record keeping. > > It seems like what you say above contradicts with this requirement: > >>> >>> [[ >>> <http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/> >>> >>> * the history of Contributions (as defined under the CLA)mustbe >>> archived permanently on the W3C Web site. >>> >>> ]] We want to be able to track the source of contributions. We also recognized when we drafted the policy that the cost of tracking word levels to a perfect granularity would be very high. Therefore we are relying on groups archiving their work, and when needed, we will scour it to find the source of contributions. > > Who is responsible for making sure this requirement is met? The Chair [1]: "Each Community Group must have at least one Chair who is responsible for ensuring the group fulfills the requirements of this document as well as the group’s operational agreements." Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/community/about/agreements/ -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 14:47:43 UTC