Re: [TR] Status Section Requirements

On 10/31/2013 04:30 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> My vote on the issues you raise above would be to move this entire
> section to a separate `TR publication process` type document with musts,
> suggestions, best practices, etc. that can be easily updated if/when the
> tide changes, as well as give the producers of the doc some flexibility.

+1 I would love for publication requirements to be a separate doc.
Particularly as I would like to completely overhaul the spec
template sometime soon. :)


Received on Thursday, 31 October 2013 21:11:45 UTC