public-w3process@w3.org from October 2013 by subject

[minutes] 2013-10-28 Chapter 7 revisions Task Force teleconference

[TR] Editorial wrt Maturity Levels

[TR] Status Section Requirements

[TR] Substantive Change

Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 21 October

Agenda for Chapter 7 Process Doc TF for Monday, 28 October

Are Director's Calls mandatory for LCCR?

Changes to classes of changes?

Comments on 23 September Editor's Draft of Chapter 7

Comments re 7.6.2 and LCCR [Was: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal]

Draft Last Call letter for the revision of Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document

Errata and Edited Recommendation

Errata and Edited Recommendation [ISSUE-45]

Going public: AB process Chapter 7 task force

in situ (or not) changes Re: small comment on the AB draft process document

ISSUE-49: Links in chapter 7 ed don't work e.g. https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ab/raw-file/default/tr.html#moztocid983157

LC-TRprocess-20131024#last-call "complex documents" is too subjective

LC-TRprocess-20131024#last-call point #2 needs clarification

LCCR is a silly name

Name of Last Call Candidate Recommendation Re: New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal

New draft of Chapter 7 Process proposal

New draft, minutes of the Chapter 7 Task Force

New Editor's draft of Chapter 7

New Editor's draft, Chapter 7

No meeting of the Process Document Task Force is planned for Nov 4 or Nov 11

Pushed proposed Ch 7 "LC draft"

Revisions to Chapter 7 of the W3C Process Document

small comment on the AB draft process document

Status and "Proposed Recommendation" Re: small comment on the AB draft process document

Suggested change to Revised Public Working Drafts section

Transition to a revised Technical Report Development Process [W3Process-ISSUE-39, W3Process-ACTION-10, proposal]

w3process-ISSUE-41 (Reviewing corrections): Remove the "Review of corrections" process?

w3process-ISSUE-42 (Patent Policy refs): Accurate and clear references to the Patent Policy

w3process-ISSUE-43 (edited rec: transition?): Does publishing an edited Recommendation require meeting all "state transition" requirements?

w3process-ISSUE-44 (MinorUpdateNoNewReview): Process should be clear that minor edits at same level do not trigger new review period

w3process-ISSUE-45 (fix all the erratas): Is the requirement that all errata should be addressed in an edited Recommendation too strong? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-46 (explain heartbeat-only): Publish and explain if 6 months pass with no change [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-47 (in situ TR changes): What kind of changes can be "silently" made to a document in /TR [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-48 (status of provisionally approved Rec): Status of this document requirements for Provisionally vs formally approved W3C Recommendations [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

w3process-ISSUE-50 (Directors-Calls): If LC and CR are combined, Director's Calls can be excessive overhead [Processes that Suck e.g. too much time, resources, make work, etc.]

What about CGs? re Reminder of Patent Policy for Non-member Contributions

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 23:20:17 UTC