- From: Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:56:05 -0700
- To: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAJK2wqVcskYfCnY0-voTRZZd8eO-o+yvfAC7f9ROvUza_BDzhQ@mail.gmail.com>
SGTM. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile < chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:29:56 +0200, Revising W3C Process Community Group > Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > w3process-ISSUE-44 (MinorUpdateNoNewReview): Process should be clear that >> minor edits at same level do not trigger new review period >> > > I frankly want to discourage groups from "minor edits". I've seen far too > many of them that make real differences, and I think it is important that a > group can justify any change explicitly. > > That said, the current draft has "If there are any *substantive* [emphasis > mine] changes made to a Last Call Candidate Recommendation other than to > remove features explicitly identified as "at risk", the Working Group must > repeat the full process of publication as a Last Call Candidate > Recommendation before the Working Group can request Recommendation status." > > This effectively allows for editorial changes. I propose to close this > issue... > > cheers > > Chaals > > > http://www.w3.org/community/**w3process/track/issues/44<http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/44> >> >> Raised by: Ian Jacobs >> On product: >> >> From http://www.w3.org/2005/10/**Process-20051014/tr.html#rec-**advance<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#rec-advance> >>> : >>> >> >> " Between any two steps after a Last Call announcement, the Working >> Group MAY publish a new draft of the technical report at the same maturity >> level provided there are no substantive changes since the earlier step." >> >> This allows a group, for example, to update a Candidate Rec with minor >> edits without having to go backwards. >> >> In the new process it would be good to allow groups to publish drafts >> with minor edits without triggering a new mandatory review period. >> >> Ian >> >> >> >> > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com > >
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2013 15:56:33 UTC