Wednesday, 30 June 2010
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 implementation status?
- raw minutes Test Cases TC 2010-06-30 available
- raw minutes regular TC 2010-06-29 available
- Fwd: Re: possible erratum
- Re: comments: PA-1
- Re: Response to ST-1
- Re: Response to ST-1
- Re: Response to ST-1
- Re: Response to ST-1
- Re: Update to RH-1
- Re: Closing comment RN-1
- Re: Question on blank nodes
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
- Re: Question on blank nodes
- Re: Question on blank nodes
- Question on blank nodes
- Re: Response to ST-1
- Response to ST-1
- Update to RH-1
- Closing comment RN-1
- 4 MINUS and NOT EXISTS test cases
- Action-198 Property Path test case
- Re: LET/assignment
Monday, 28 June 2010
- Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-06-29
- [tests] Re: Dedicated TC on Test Cases 2010-06-30
- Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-06-29
- LET/assignment
- ISSUE-57: Assignment/LET
- Dedicated TC on Test Cases 2010-06-30
- Action-195: Project expression test case
- Re: Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-06-29
- Agenda SPARQL TC 2010-06-29
- Action-193: Subquery test case
- comments: PA-1 (was: IRI creation and encoding)
- comments: PA-2
- comments: RH-1
Sunday, 27 June 2010
Thursday, 24 June 2010
- Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE
- Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE
- Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE
- Re: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE
- Fwd: Standardise method for selecting extensions for DESCRIBE
Wednesday, 23 June 2010
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
- Re: [TF-PP] Moving forward
- Re: [TF-PP] Moving forward
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. June 15, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. June 15, 2010
Monday, 14 June 2010
Sunday, 13 June 2010
Wednesday, 9 June 2010
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: [TF-PP] Moving forward
- [TF-PP] Moving forward
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Editorial comment/question on the federation query draft...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- [admin] Minutes form today's TC...
- regrets for next week
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- Today's meeting
- Re: another aggregates test case...
- another aggregates test case...
Monday, 7 June 2010
- minutes from todays HTTP RDF update TC...
- some more comments on http-rdf-update current version ...
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: Reminder/agenda: tomorrow: "SPARQL WG Dedicated Teleconference for HTTP RDF Update Issues"
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: Reminder/agenda: tomorrow: "SPARQL WG Dedicated Teleconference for HTTP RDF Update Issues"
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: 2010-06-08 TC Agenda
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: 2010-06-08 TC Agenda
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
- Poll for dedicated Test Cases TC
- 2010-06-08 TC Agenda
Sunday, 6 June 2010
- minutes TC 2010-06-01 ...
- Reminder/agenda: tomorrow: "SPARQL WG Dedicated Teleconference for HTTP RDF Update Issues"
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
Friday, 4 June 2010
- Re: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: Fwd: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Fwd: IRI creation and encoding
- Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Fwd: IRI creation and encoding
Thursday, 3 June 2010
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)
- Re: [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
- [TF-LIB] first text for new library built-in functions
- Re: [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
- Re: [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
Wednesday, 2 June 2010
- Re: [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
- Re: [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
- Re: [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
- [TF-PP] Worked examples of cardinality for :p{2} and :p+
- Re: Broken links fixed for publication
Tuesday, 1 June 2010
- Call for Exclusions: SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions
- Broken links fixed for publication
- Re: [TF-PP] Property paths and entailments
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday June 1, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday June 1, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday June 1, 2010
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday June 1, 2010
Monday, 31 May 2010
Friday, 28 May 2010
- PP paths semantics
- Re: [TF-PP] Property paths and entailments
- Re: Property Paths Cardinality
- Re: [PP] [ENT] Property paths and entailments
- Re: Property Paths Cardinality
- [TF-PP] Property paths and entailments
- Property Paths Cardinality
- Poll: "SPARQL WG Dedicated Teleconference for HTTP RDF Update Issues"
- property path proposals
Thursday, 27 May 2010
- Re: [TF-PP] Diagram for telecon
- Re: [TF-PP] IRI and base URIs
- Re: [TF-PP] Diagram for telecon
- short term regrets for the PP call today...
- Re: [TF-PP] IRI and base URIs
- Re: [TF-PP] IRI and base URIs
- Re: [TF-PP] IRI and base URIs
- Re: [TF-PP] IRI and base URIs
- [TF-PP] IRI and base URIs
- [TF-PP] Diagram for telecon
Wednesday, 26 May 2010
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- [Admin] Today's TC minutes ... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-25
- SERVICE in WHERE for Update
- Re: exists
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- Re: exists
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- exists
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: brief agenda for the TC tomorrow
Monday, 24 May 2010
- Re: brief agenda for the TC tomorrow
- Re: brief agenda for the TC tomorrow
- Re: brief agenda for the TC tomorrow
- brief agenda for the TC tomorrow
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1. Update editors' draft
- Introduction: Nicholas Humfrey
- Re: At risk for 25th May
Sunday, 23 May 2010
Saturday, 22 May 2010
Friday, 21 May 2010
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Networked RDF Information or Knowledge - Was Re: Need input before I can address Kjetil's comment
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- Re: example font size in local.css
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- [ENT] Another URI issue still unsolved (was: Re: Today's TC minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-18)
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- Re: Need input before I can address Kjetil's comment - Was: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Re: Base URI in updates?
Thursday, 20 May 2010
- Re: Need input before I can address Kjetil's comment - Was: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: Negation section text updated.
- Re: [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: Negation section text updated.
- Re: Negation section text updated.
- Re: Need input before I can address Kjetil's comment - Was: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Fwd: SPARQL XML namespace confusion
- Re: Negation section text updated.
- Re: Negation section text updated.
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Tuesday, 18 May 2010
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1. Update editors' draft
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1. Update editors' draft
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- [ENT] reuse of rif namespace for rif:imports.
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Today's TC minutes http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-18
- Need input before I can address Kjetil's comment - Was: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: MINUS
- Re: HTTP Protocol review
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- MINUS
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1. Update editors' draft
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1. Update editors' draft
- Re: HTTP Protocol review
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- [public-rdf-dawg] <none>
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Poll: "SPARQL WG Dedicated Teleconference for Property Path Issues"
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: basic federated query TODOs
- Re: HTTP Protocol review
Monday, 17 May 2010
- Re: HTTP Protocol review
- Re: Base URI in updates?
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: SPARQL TC 2010-05-18 Agenda
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- FW: last day to answer the SPARQL WG negation survey
- Re: SPARQL TC 2010-05-18 Agenda
- Re: SPARQL TC 2010-05-18 Agenda
- [wbs] response to 'How should SPARQL 1.1 resolve ISSUE-29, the handling of negation?'
- Re: issue round-up, part 1
- Re: Review of SPARQL 1.1. Update editors' draft
- Re: Review of SPARQL Query Doc
- SPARQL TC 2010-05-18 Agenda
Sunday, 16 May 2010
Saturday, 15 May 2010
Friday, 14 May 2010
- Re: basic federated query TODOs
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
Thursday, 13 May 2010
- Re: [ENT] Editorial Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Editorial Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- Re: [ENT] Editorial Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
- [ENT] Editorial Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
- [ENT] Review comments on the SPARQL 1.1. Entailment regime document
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
- basic federated query TODOs
- Re: SPARQL Query: subqueries
- Public implementations of SPARQL 1.1 draft features?
- [admin] today's TC minutes... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-11
- Re: SPARQL Query: subqueries
- Re: Naming (Re: Service Description document)
- Re: [Entailment] D-entailment (and upwards) issue?
- Regrets for 5/11/10
- Re: [Entailment] D-entailment (and upwards) issue?
- Re: [Entailment] D-entailment (and upwards) issue?
- Re: [Entailment] D-entailment (and upwards) issue?
- Re: [Entailment] D-entailment (and upwards) issue?
- [Entailment] D-entailment (and upwards) issue?
- Re: Comment response NH-1,2,3
- Re: Comment response NH-1,2,3
- Re: Naming (Re: Service Description document)
Monday, 10 May 2010
- Re: Naming (Re: Service Description document)
- Re: SPARQL WG meeting tomorrow, May 11, 2010 - Agenda to follow
- Re: SPARQL Query: subqueries
- Re: SD doc review
- Re: SPARQL WG meeting tomorrow, May 11, 2010 - Agenda to follow
- SPARQL WG meeting tomorrow, May 11, 2010 - Agenda to follow
- SPARQL Query: subqueries
- Re: SD doc review
- SD doc review
- Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation
- Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation
Saturday, 8 May 2010
Friday, 7 May 2010
- Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation
- Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation
- Re: Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation
- Naming (Re: Service Description document)
- Re: Return codes
- Re: Return codes
- Web survey to resolve ISSUE-29 on negation
- Re: Return codes
- Re: Minutes for Tuesday May, 4 2010
Thursday, 6 May 2010
Wednesday, 5 May 2010
- URI-s for formats
- Re: Clarification on blank nodes in DELETE templates.
- Re: Minutes for Tuesday May, 4 2010
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
Monday, 3 May 2010
Friday, 30 April 2010
Thursday, 29 April 2010
- Re: Update Syntax
- Clarification on blank nodes in DELETE templates.
- Re: Update Syntax
- Re: Update Syntax
- Re: SPARQL Grammar updated
- Re: SPARQL Grammar updated
Wednesday, 28 April 2010
- Re: Update Syntax
- Re: Update Syntax
- Re: Update Syntax
- Re: Update Syntax
- Re: Update Syntax
- Fwd: Update Syntax
Tuesday, 27 April 2010
- FW: To all SPARQL editores! issues/schedule for next publication round...
- TC 2010-04-27 minutes ...
- Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Re: Service Description document
- Re: To all SPARQL editores! issues/schedule for next publication round...
- Re: To all SPARQL editores! issues/schedule for next publication round...
- Re: To all SPARQL editores! issues/schedule for next publication round...
- Re: Service Description document
- Re: sparql extensions and protocol conformance
- Service Description document
Monday, 26 April 2010
- sparql extensions and protocol conformance
- Call for Exclusions (Update): SPARQL 1.1 Property Paths
- Re: SPARQL TC 2010-04-27
- Re: SPARQL Grammar updated
- Re: SPARQL Grammar updated
Sunday, 25 April 2010
- SPARQL Grammar updated
- SPARQL TC 2010-04-27
- [ADMIN] minutes from last time http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-04-20
Thursday, 22 April 2010
- Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Re: SPARQL HTTP Update terminology (was: Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?))
- Re: ACTION-221 - Reformulate Condition 4
Tuesday, 20 April 2010
- Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- New Service Description features
- Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- RE: ACTION-221 - Reformulate Condition 4
- Re: SPARQL HTTP Update terminology (was: Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?))
- Re: Actions 211 and 212: proposed changes to the extensions of basic graph pattern matching
Monday, 19 April 2010
- Re: Blank node and nested queries
- Re: SPARQL HTTP Update terminology (was: Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?))
- Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Wiki authentication changing
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Tuesday, April 20, 2010
- Resolving negation (MINUS / NOT EXISTS)
- Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction
- Re: Blank node and nested queries
- Re: Actions 211 and 212: proposed changes to the extensions of basic graph pattern matching
- SPARQL HTTP Update terminology (was: Re: ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?))
- Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction
- Blank node and nested queries
Sunday, 18 April 2010
- Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction
- Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction
- Re: Renaming sd:AggregateFunction
- ISSUE-49 (are graphs information resources?)
- Renaming sd:AggregateFunction
- Apologies for 20/April
Saturday, 17 April 2010
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Tuesday, 13 April 2010
Monday, 12 April 2010
- SPARQL WG Agenda, Tuesday Apr. 13, 2010
- Re: Soliciting for agenda topics for Tuesday's SPARQL WG teleconference
- Re: Actions 211 and 212: proposed changes to the extensions of basic graph pattern matching
- Re: Soliciting for agenda topics for Tuesday's SPARQL WG teleconference
- Re: Actions 211 and 212: proposed changes to the extensions of basic graph pattern matching
- Re: Soliciting for agenda topics for Tuesday's SPARQL WG teleconference
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
Sunday, 11 April 2010
Friday, 9 April 2010
- Actions 211 and 212: proposed changes to the extensions of basic graph pattern matching
- SPARQL WG Minutes, April 6, 2010
Tuesday, 6 April 2010
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Options for moving forward on negation
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - April 6, 2010
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - April 6, 2010
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: comment on update
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- A common functions for STRDT(), STRLANG() and URI() functionality.
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
Monday, 5 April 2010
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - April 6, 2010
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- SPARQL WG Agenda - April 6, 2010
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects
- Re: comment on update
- Re: Negation decision : unexpected effects