- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:57:53 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi everyone, The code for the teleconference (starting now) is 772775. We'll be in #sparql as usual. Lee On 6/7/2010 9:08 AM, Axel Polleres wrote: > I refined the agenda a bit and added links at: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-06-07 > > • Determining base URI for the cases that involve graph=g > • Chime's last mail > • The term "networked RDF knowledge" > • andy e.g. suggests "RDF data" > • chime can live with "RDF knowledge" > • more discussion? > • Whether we've settled Kjetil's issue involving http-range-14 as a reference etc. > • ISSUE-49 > • last mail on that > • could/should we discourage that "http" resources that respond to a GET request with a 2xx response be used as graph-uris? not sure... > • Issue in Section 5.3: "How would a client come to discover the URI of the network-manipulable RDF dataset?" > > If you have any more http rdf update issues, please speak up! > > talk to you in an hour! (a volunteer for scribing would be appreciated!) > > Axel > > On 6 Jun 2010, at 21:07, Axel Polleres wrote: > >> This was decided last week, but unfortunately we have problems with the minutes still (rrsagent wasn't there). The dedicated HTTP RDF update conf is gonna be >> >> tomorrow June 7th: 10am ET = 3pm BST >> >> Roughly, we will have to discuss the following items: >> >> + Determining base URI for the cases that involve graph=g >> + The term "networked RDF knowledge" >> + Whether we've settled Kjetil's issue involving http-range-14 as a reference etc. >> >> I will try to detail this a bit more by later tonight (still travelling). >> The call is scheduled for 2 hrs, let's see whether we need all of it. >> >> best, >> Axel >> >> >> On 28 May 2010, at 03:42, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Our first dedicated teleconference on property path issues was very >>> successful. I'd like to try to schedule another one to discuss open >>> issues with our HTTP RDF Update specification, particularly surrounding >>> embedded graph= parameters, terminology (knowledge et al.), base URIs, etc. >>> >>> If you are interested in participating in a dedicated, *2 hour* >>> teleconference on open HTTP RDF Update issues, please fill out the >>> scheduling poll at this link: >>> >>> http://doodle.com/6k555386gp5resku >>> >>> I've tried to include all reasonable days& times in the next 2 weeks. >>> >>> Please reply before Tuesday's teleconferenceWe'll try to choose a time >>> at the end of this week. >>> >>> Lee >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 14:05:51 UTC