- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:11:53 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-5, ISSUE-6, ISSUE-7, and ISSUE-13 with no change, > noting that SPARQL 1.1 will only allow SELECT subqueries within the > query pattern. Agree to close on the understanding that "ASK queries in FILTERs" are covered by EXIST/NOT EXISTS in FILTERs. > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the > same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED > clauses are not permitted in subqueries. Agreed with the understanding that active graph of the outer query is is the initial active graph of the subquery. > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the > following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE. Agreed. Andy
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 22:12:30 UTC